Saturday, March 27, 2010
Barack Obama Countdown. Gone in...
Want to Advertise in this space? Email us at Ads@ObamaCountdownWidg
Friday, March 26, 2010
After ObamaCare FAIL, Bishops Lash Out
The commitment by Cardinal George to being "never political" is, to put it kindly, unintelligible.
All lobbying is political.
The USCCB goes beyond political. It is a partisan, left-wing organization.
Any time the USCCB takes a position that a Catholic can disagree with without sinning, the USCCB: 1) is taking a partisan political position; 2) is abusing (and progressively eroding) the authority of the bishops who are its members.
It goes without saying that this is true a fortiori when the USCCB takes a position that a Catholic cannot agree with without sinning.
A perfect example is this latest, year-long scandal of the USCCB's promoting a totalitarian, collectivist, murderous, financially ruinous, unConstitutional healthcare "reform."
Obamacare is counter to the teaching of the Catholic Church IN TOTO, yet it had the support of the USCCB until the last moments, when it became clear that abortion funding could not be excised.
No matter what meaningless abortion verbiage the Obamacare legislation MIGHT have contained, Cardinal George and the entire USCCB have known since November of 2008 that ANY "reform" legislation was going to be designed and administered by the most pro-abortion administration in history--with principal regulatory authority being vested in Kathleen Sebelius, the second-most blood-thirsty woman Archbishop Donald Wuerl has ever certified as worthy to receive Holy Communion.
If Cardinal George and the USCCB could swallow the bill itself (just without explicit abortion funding), and the certainty that, even without explicit abortion funding, it would be administered and embellished by Kathleen Sebelius and an army of other infanticide enthusiasts, there is no rational basis for their rejection of the Executive Order that Bart Stupak so pathetically wears to cover his shame.
And yet we have seen, in the space of less than a week, multiple bishops lashing out at Stupak, NETWORK, the LCWR, and the CHA. Shame on them.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1001219.htm
Cardinal praises expanded health care but fears remain on abortion
By Nancy Frazier O'Brien
Catholic News Service
WASHINGTON (CNS) -- The president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops praised new health reform legislation for expanding health care to more Americans but said the bishops and the Catholic community will be watching closely to ensure that the new law does not expand federal funding of abortion.
"We are apprehensive as we look to the future, even as we applaud much of the increased care that will be available," Cardinal Francis E. George of Chicago told Catholic News Service March 23, shortly after U.S. President Barack Obama signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
"So we will watch basically and try to continue to enter into conversations as a moral voice -- never as a political voice; we've been very careful to insist upon the moral principles that everybody should be cared for and no one should be deliberately killed," he added.
Cardinal George acknowledged in the interview that "the unity of the church has been wounded" in various political actions and conversations surrounding the health reform debate. The USCCB opposed the Senate bill that passed the House March 21, while some Catholic groups and members of Congress supported it.
"We are certainly concerned about division in the church, because bishops have to be the people who are concerned about its unity, about keeping people together around Christ," he said.
"The bishops know that they don't speak for every one of the 61 million Catholics in the country, but what we do is we speak for the Catholic faith itself," he said. "And those who share the faith will gather around."
The cardinal said it remained to be seen whether the executive order promised by Obama would be adequate to keep the status quo on federal funding of abortion.
"The president's executive order puts in some administrative protections that we are very grateful for, but an administrative order doesn't substitute for a statute," he said.
Asked whether he expected church agencies to face difficulties related to abortion in the health reform law, the cardinal said, "We'll see how that plays out in the courts."
"I suspect that there will be court challenges to Catholic medical practice," he added.
Cardinal George also rejected claims by some that the USCCB had allied itself in the health reform debate with groups that were primarily interested in advancing the Republican agenda.
"I really don't think that's true," he said. "The principles are twofold -- everybody taken care of, nobody killed. And I think that moral voice, while it doesn't correspond politically to either party, has been consistent."
Also March 23, the USCCB released a statement by Cardinal George on health reform that was endorsed by the bishops' 32-member Administrative Committee.
The statement noted that the bishops' conference has worked for nearly a century to achieve "reform of our health care system so that all may have access to the care that recognizes and affirms their human dignity."
"As Catholic bishops, we have expressed our support for efforts to address this national and societal shortcoming," it added. "Many elements of the health care reform measure signed into law by the president address these concerns and so help to fulfill the duty that we have to each other for the common good.
"Nevertheless, for whatever good this law achieves or intends, we as Catholic bishops have opposed its passage because there is compelling evidence that it would expand the role of the federal government in funding and facilitating abortion and plans to cover abortion," it said.
The statement also said the new law "failed to include necessary language to provide essential conscience protections" and could leave many immigrant workers and families "worse off since they will not be allowed to purchase health coverage in the new exchanges to be created, even if they use their own money."
The statement expressed the belief that "new legislation to address its deficiencies will almost certainly be required."
Without naming any of them, the statement also praised "the principled actions of the pro-life members of Congress from both parties, in the House and the Senate, who have worked courageously to create legislation that respects the principles" outlined by the bishops.
"They have often been vilified and have worked against great odds," it added.
All lobbying is political.
The USCCB goes beyond political. It is a partisan, left-wing organization.
Any time the USCCB takes a position that a Catholic can disagree with without sinning, the USCCB: 1) is taking a partisan political position; 2) is abusing (and progressively eroding) the authority of the bishops who are its members.
It goes without saying that this is true a fortiori when the USCCB takes a position that a Catholic cannot agree with without sinning.
A perfect example is this latest, year-long scandal of the USCCB's promoting a totalitarian, collectivist, murderous, financially ruinous, unConstitutional healthcare "reform."
Obamacare is counter to the teaching of the Catholic Church IN TOTO, yet it had the support of the USCCB until the last moments, when it became clear that abortion funding could not be excised.
No matter what meaningless abortion verbiage the Obamacare legislation MIGHT have contained, Cardinal George and the entire USCCB have known since November of 2008 that ANY "reform" legislation was going to be designed and administered by the most pro-abortion administration in history--with principal regulatory authority being vested in Kathleen Sebelius, the second-most blood-thirsty woman Archbishop Donald Wuerl has ever certified as worthy to receive Holy Communion.
If Cardinal George and the USCCB could swallow the bill itself (just without explicit abortion funding), and the certainty that, even without explicit abortion funding, it would be administered and embellished by Kathleen Sebelius and an army of other infanticide enthusiasts, there is no rational basis for their rejection of the Executive Order that Bart Stupak so pathetically wears to cover his shame.
And yet we have seen, in the space of less than a week, multiple bishops lashing out at Stupak, NETWORK, the LCWR, and the CHA. Shame on them.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1001219.htm
Cardinal praises expanded health care but fears remain on abortion
 Cardinal Francis E. George of Chicago, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, talks with Catholic News Service in Washington March 23, shortly after President Barack Obama signed the new health reform package into law. (CNS/Bob Roller) |
Catholic News Service
WASHINGTON (CNS) -- The president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops praised new health reform legislation for expanding health care to more Americans but said the bishops and the Catholic community will be watching closely to ensure that the new law does not expand federal funding of abortion.
"We are apprehensive as we look to the future, even as we applaud much of the increased care that will be available," Cardinal Francis E. George of Chicago told Catholic News Service March 23, shortly after U.S. President Barack Obama signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
"So we will watch basically and try to continue to enter into conversations as a moral voice -- never as a political voice; we've been very careful to insist upon the moral principles that everybody should be cared for and no one should be deliberately killed," he added.
Cardinal George acknowledged in the interview that "the unity of the church has been wounded" in various political actions and conversations surrounding the health reform debate. The USCCB opposed the Senate bill that passed the House March 21, while some Catholic groups and members of Congress supported it.
"We are certainly concerned about division in the church, because bishops have to be the people who are concerned about its unity, about keeping people together around Christ," he said.
"The bishops know that they don't speak for every one of the 61 million Catholics in the country, but what we do is we speak for the Catholic faith itself," he said. "And those who share the faith will gather around."
The cardinal said it remained to be seen whether the executive order promised by Obama would be adequate to keep the status quo on federal funding of abortion.
"The president's executive order puts in some administrative protections that we are very grateful for, but an administrative order doesn't substitute for a statute," he said.
Asked whether he expected church agencies to face difficulties related to abortion in the health reform law, the cardinal said, "We'll see how that plays out in the courts."
"I suspect that there will be court challenges to Catholic medical practice," he added.
Cardinal George also rejected claims by some that the USCCB had allied itself in the health reform debate with groups that were primarily interested in advancing the Republican agenda.
"I really don't think that's true," he said. "The principles are twofold -- everybody taken care of, nobody killed. And I think that moral voice, while it doesn't correspond politically to either party, has been consistent."
Also March 23, the USCCB released a statement by Cardinal George on health reform that was endorsed by the bishops' 32-member Administrative Committee.
The statement noted that the bishops' conference has worked for nearly a century to achieve "reform of our health care system so that all may have access to the care that recognizes and affirms their human dignity."
"As Catholic bishops, we have expressed our support for efforts to address this national and societal shortcoming," it added. "Many elements of the health care reform measure signed into law by the president address these concerns and so help to fulfill the duty that we have to each other for the common good.
"Nevertheless, for whatever good this law achieves or intends, we as Catholic bishops have opposed its passage because there is compelling evidence that it would expand the role of the federal government in funding and facilitating abortion and plans to cover abortion," it said.
The statement also said the new law "failed to include necessary language to provide essential conscience protections" and could leave many immigrant workers and families "worse off since they will not be allowed to purchase health coverage in the new exchanges to be created, even if they use their own money."
The statement expressed the belief that "new legislation to address its deficiencies will almost certainly be required."
Without naming any of them, the statement also praised "the principled actions of the pro-life members of Congress from both parties, in the House and the Senate, who have worked courageously to create legislation that respects the principles" outlined by the bishops.
"They have often been vilified and have worked against great odds," it added.
Archbishop Chaput Gives Back of the Hand to Pro-Life Congressmen
Archbishop Chaput should be ashamed to attack the fake Catholic groups, while at the same time never mentioning the USCCB.
The USCCB, fully aware that ObamaCare would be designed by Obama, Pelosi, Ezekiel Emanuel, Cass Sunstein, David Axelrod, the Tides Foundation, the Apollo Project, etc., etc., and managed by Obama appointees like Kathleen Sebelius, supported the whole monster for nearly a year, expressing reservations about nothing except the absence of some meaningless abortion language that--even had it been included in the bill--would have been nullified by the first federal court that got a whack at it.
It is disgusting that Archbishop Chaput and "the bishops" don't (and they CAN'T, having supported this evil from the beginning) have a kind word for the Republicans who fought to kill this monster from beginning to end. As usual, pro-life Republicans get the back of the hand from "the bishops," because pro-life Republicans won't join "the bishops" in promoting collectivism, which the Catholic Church condemns.
Rep. Paul Ryan's little finger is more Catholic than the whole USCCB.
Fr. VF
The USCCB, fully aware that ObamaCare would be designed by Obama, Pelosi, Ezekiel Emanuel, Cass Sunstein, David Axelrod, the Tides Foundation, the Apollo Project, etc., etc., and managed by Obama appointees like Kathleen Sebelius, supported the whole monster for nearly a year, expressing reservations about nothing except the absence of some meaningless abortion language that--even had it been included in the bill--would have been nullified by the first federal court that got a whack at it.
It is disgusting that Archbishop Chaput and "the bishops" don't (and they CAN'T, having supported this evil from the beginning) have a kind word for the Republicans who fought to kill this monster from beginning to end. As usual, pro-life Republicans get the back of the hand from "the bishops," because pro-life Republicans won't join "the bishops" in promoting collectivism, which the Catholic Church condemns.
Rep. Paul Ryan's little finger is more Catholic than the whole USCCB.
Fr. VF
March 22, 2010
A bad bill and how we got it
The following column by Archbishop Chaput is scheduled for print publication in the March 24, 2010 issue of the Denver Catholic Register.
As current federal health-care legislation moves forward toward law, we need to draw several lessons from events of the last weeks and months:
First, the bill passed by the House on March 21 is a failure of decent lawmaking. It has not been “fixed.” It remains unethical and defective on all of the issues pressed by the U.S. bishops and prolife groups for the past seven months.
Second, the Executive Order promised by the White House to ban the use of federal funds for abortion does not solve the many problems with the bill, which is why the bishops did not -- and still do not – see it as a real solution. Executive Orders can be rescinded or reinterpreted at any time. Some current congressional leaders have already shown a pattern of evasion, ill will and obstinacy on the moral issues involved in this legislation, and the track record of the White House in keeping its promises regarding abortion-related issues does not inspire confidence. The fact that congressional leaders granted this one modest and inadequate concession only at the last moment, and only to force the passage of this deeply flawed bill, should give no one comfort.
Third, the combination of pressure and disinformation used to break the prolife witness on this bill among Democratic members of Congress – despite the strong resistance to this legislation that continues among American voters – should put an end to any talk by Washington leaders about serving the common good or seeking common ground. Words need actions to give them flesh. At many points over the past seven months, congressional leaders could have resolved the serious moral issues inherent in this legislation. They did not. No shower of reassuring words now can wash away that fact.
Fourth, self-described “Catholic” groups have done a serious disservice to justice, to the Church, and to the ethical needs of the American people by undercutting the leadership and witness of their own bishops. For groups like Catholics United, this is unsurprising. In their effect, if not in formal intent, such groups exist to advance the interests of a particular political spectrum. Nor is it newsworthy from an organization like Network, which – whatever the nature of its good work -- has rarely shown much enthusiasm for a definition of “social justice” that includes the rights of the unborn child.
But the actions of the Catholic Health Association (CHA) in providing a deliberate public counter-message to the bishops were both surprising and profoundly disappointing; and also genuinely damaging. In the crucial final days of debate on health-care legislation, CHA lobbyists worked directly against the efforts of the American bishops in their approach to members of Congress. The bad law we now likely face, we owe in part to the efforts of the Catholic Health Association and similar “Catholic” organizations.
Here in Colorado, many thousands of ordinary, faithful Catholics, from both political parties, have worked hard over the past seven months to advance sensible, legitimate health-care reform; the kind that serves the poor and protects the rights of the unborn child, and immigrants, and the freedom of conscience rights of health-care professionals and institutions. If that effort seems to have failed, faithful Catholics don’t bear the blame. That responsibility lies elsewhere. I’m grateful to everyone in the archdiocese who has worked so hard on this issue out of love for God’s people and fidelity to their Catholic faith. Come good or bad, that kind of effort is never wasted.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)